Forced vaccinations, part II
The United Kingdom, like some other Western countries, has been widely distributing a vaccine against cervical cancer. Cervical cancer, which can be detected early by simple tests and then fully treated, kills about 1,000 British women per year.
One thousand. Five times less than the country’s suicide rate for 2007; eight times less than the alcohol-related deaths for the same year; a disturbing 106 times less than the supposed “smoking-related” deaths each year; and an astonishing 193 times less than the 2008 road casualties.
Why would a benevolent government force a vaccination (either through sheer force or disinformation) on its people if the disease is so easily detectable and treatable?
One has to wonder, especially when the vaccine tends to cause a myriad of distressing side-effects:
Aside from cervical cancer, the aforementioned swine flu vaccine carries the same warning: if you take the slightest bit of care for your own body and health, you will cope and live through it unharmed. Thousands of people who have been subjected to either vaccine have reported very bad side-effects (with both the worst-case scenario is possibly painful death), and more people have been harmed by the vaccines than by the disease they’re supposed to protect us against.
As an extra punch in the face, these vaccines aren’t free: the tax-payer is, once again, the one suffering the costs. This time, the UK taxpayer is shelling out for a way too expensive, possibly disability-causing or even lethal vaccine against a disease that could be easily prevented and treated.
Our governments certainly didn’t learn anything from the United States’ 1976 swine flu vaccination failure.
Is there anything they won’t do for their friends who have certain business interests?